HORVATH

v.

FIVE POINTS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI

Citator

Cited By

• Bart Jacobs v. State, 389 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …trast, the person to whom Jacobs directly spoke, Potter, himself testified and recounted the conversation to the jury. Thus, the recording of that same conversation was admissible under Hajdu v. State, 189 So. 2d 230 (Fla.3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 923 (Fla.1967). In Hajdu, which was heavily relied upon in Sarmiento, this court stated at 189 So. 2d 233-34: The State relies upon the opinion of this court in Gomien v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 511. This reliance is misplaced. The Gomien opini…
• State v. Shaktman, 389 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …iento v. State, 371 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), review accepted, 25 Fla.L.W. i (1980); State v. Muscara, 334 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 344 So. 2d 327 (Fla.1977); Hajdu v. State, 189 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 923 (Fla.1967). The statutory law, both federal and state, appears to authorize the subject electronic eavesdropping. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 2511(2)(c) (1970); §§ 934.03(2)(e), 934.-08(3), Fla.Stat. (1979). These statutes, however, do not and cannot resolve…
• Hoberman v. State, 400 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1981)
  …defendant’s home, and we approved the decision of the Third District. The Third District, in Sarmiento v. State, 371 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), reaffirmed its earlier decision of Hajdu v. State, 189 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 923 (Fla.1967). In Hajdu, the Third District held that the person outside the defendant’s home who monitored a conversation which took place inside the home could not testify as to the contents of the conversation. However, it distinguished the case bef…

Authorities Cited

• George A. Horvath and Ernest v. Horvath, 190 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)