COLLINS

v.

NEBRASKA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Calvert, 523 F.2d 895 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …enstein, 456 F. 2d 1006, 1011 (8th Cir. 1972); United States v. Bartlett, 449 F. 2d 700, 704 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 932, 92 S.Ct. 990, 30 L.Ed.2d 808 (1972); United States v. Billingsley, 440 F. 2d 823, 827 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 909, 91 S.Ct. 2219, 29 L.Ed.2d 687 (1971); VIII Wigmore on Evidence § 2298 (McNaughton Rev.1961). See also Clark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1, 15, 53 S.Ct. 465, 77 L.Ed. 993 (1933) (dictum). “The privilege takes flight if the relation is abused.” Id. In…
• United States v. Ziperstein, 601 F.2d 281 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …ns come within the daily observation of a pharmacist and were beyond any reasonable expectation of privacy which Ziperstein had. An identical result was reached by this circuit in United States v. Billingsley, 440 F. 2d 823 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 909, 91 S.Ct. 2219, 29 L.Ed.2d 687 (1971). In Billingsley, documents relating to the incorporation of a business entity were removed by one of the corporate officers from the office of one of the convicted defendants. We upheld the government’s use of…
• In re Walsh, 623 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …ver, the information must be disclosed if the government makes a prima facie case that the attorney was retained in order to promote intended or continuing criminal activity. United States v. Billingsley, 440 F. 2d 823, 827 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 909, 91 S.Ct. 2219, 29 L.Ed.2d 687 (1971). As stated in United States v. Hodge and Zweig, 548 F. 2d 1347, 1354 (9th Cir. 1977), “the attorney-client privilege is not to be used as a cloak for illegal or fraudulent behavior.” Accord, In Grand Jury Subpoe…