GUNDERSON ET AL.

v.

ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Zimmer v. McKEITHEN, 485 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …he Formation of an Extraordinary Legal Remedy, 22 Am.U.L.Rev. 111, 124 (1972), the panel’s decision that Connor and Sheffield govern is quite appropriate. . A similar contention was made in Gunderson v. Adams, 328 F.Supp. 584 (S.D.Fla. 1970) aff’d, 403 U.S. 913, 91 S.Ct. 2225, 29 L.Ed.2d 692 (1971) where a Florida plan, codifying a court ordered plan, was challenged and upheld. . Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735-746, 93 S.Ct. 2321, 2328, 37 L.Ed.2d 298, 308 (1973). Thus, census figures include aliens, n…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …t is especially favorable to the interests of one’s own group, or to be excluded from a district that is dominated by some other group. Taylor v. McKeithen, 5 Cir. 1974, 499 F. 2d 893; Gunderson v. Adams, S.D. Fla.1970, 328 F.Supp. 584, aff’d, 1971, 403 U.S. 913, 91 S.Ct. 2225, 29 L.Ed.2d 692; see Ferrell v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Hall, W.D.Okl.1972, 339 F.Supp. 73, aff’d, 406 U.S. 939, 92 S.Ct. 2045, 32 L.Ed.2d 328. The critical question under Chavis and Regester is not whether the challenged political…