POLSKY

v.

WETHERILL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34 (U.S. 1972)
  …epted the holdings of the Kelly and Hammond cases. Department of Justice Memo. No. 652 (Oct. 23, 1969). See United States ex rel. Brooks v. Clifford, 409 F. 2d 700, 701 (CA4). Compare Noyd v. McNamara, 378 F. 2d 538 (CA10), with Polsky v. Wetherill, 403 U. S. 916, vacating judgment in 438 F. 2d 132 (CA10). The respondents do not contend that the military courts have a special competence in determining if a conscientious objector application has been denied without basis in fact. As they acknowledge in their…
• Lawrence and next friend v. Chater, 516 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1996)
  …by the Solicitor General, see, e.g., Wells v. United States, 511 U. S. 1050 (1994); Reed v. United States, 510 U. S. 1188 (1994); Ramirez v. United States, 510 U. S. 1103 (1994); Chappell v. United States, 494 U. S. 1075 (1990); Polsky v. Wetherill, 403 U. S. 916 (1971), and state attorneys general, see, e. g., Cuffle v. Avenenti, 498 U. S. 996 (1990); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U. S. 25 (1963). This practice has some virtues. In an appropriate case, a GVR order conserves the scarce resources of this Court tha…
• Martinez v. United States, 464 F.2d 1289 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …retroactive in a forfeiture proceeding. This position was fortified in United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443, 92 S.Ct. 589, 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972). Finally, the matter was brought home to this court in unmistakable terms in Colton v. United States, 403 U.S. 916, 91 S.Ct. 2235, 29 L.Ed.2d 693 (1971), reversing this court’s unpublished per curiam opinion in No. 413-70, Colton v. United States. The Colton case involved a § 4744(a) charge wherein we had held that failure to assert the privilege against self-in…