RAGSDALE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. McCORD, 509 F.2d 334 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …v. United States, 413 F. 2d 1001, 1003 (5th Cir. 1969); United States v. Ramos, 413 F. 2d 743, 746 (1st Cir. 1969); United States v. Spica, 413 F. 2d 129, 132-133 (8th Cir. 1969); United States v. Ragsdale, 438 F. 2d 21, 27 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 919, 91 S.Ct. 2231, 29 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971). See also United States v. Leonard & Sarvis, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 36, 494 F. 2d 955, 976-977 (1974) (Bazelon, C. J. concurring in part, dissenting in part). . See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L…
• United States v. Werner, 620 F.2d 922 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …rance exists until the defendant makes a convincing showing that he has both important testimony to give concerning one count and strong need to refrain from testifying on the other”); Tarallo v. LeVallee, 433 F. 2d 4, 6 (2 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 919, 91 S.Ct. 2235, 29 L.Ed.2d 697 (1971) (quoting from Baker v. United States, supra); United States v. Jamar, supra, 561 F. 2d at 1108 n. 9 (“a particularized showing must be made concerning the testimony the defendant wishes to give and his reasons f…
• Gambocz v. Yelencsics, 468 F.2d 837 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …e withdrawn. The district court granted the motion and dismissed with prejudice. Subsequently, on May 11, 1970, appellant moved to reopen the judgment. The motion was denied and we affirmed. Gambocz v. Ellmyer, 438 F. 2d 915 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 919, 91 S.Ct. 2232, 29 L.Ed.2d 697 (1971), reh. denied, 404 U.S. 875, 92 S.Ct. 30, 30 L.Ed.2d 121 (1972). Two and one half weeks after affirmance of the denial of his motion to reopen, but before denial of his petition for rehearing en banc and'denial o…

  ← 1 / 2 →