CLYDE DELMA DENMARK

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1989)
  …1st DCA 1976) (defendant cannot take advantage of plea entered to unalleged offense); Johnson v. State, 190 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966) (unauthorized substantive amendment of information prior to trial waived by failure to object), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1967). Essentially, respondent’s position is that the trial court erred in not delaying the trial by requiring the state to retype and refile a “new” information even though both parties understood the charge and urged immediate trial. We reje…
• Nelson v. State, 490 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1986)
  …frontation clause. Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 92 S.Ct. 1056, 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972); Hall v. State, 381 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1978); Broome v. State, 194 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Seely v. State, 191 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1967). Indeed, as this Court previously stated in Hall v. State: The fact that the defendants here were tried separately rather than jointly does not vitiate the constitutional infirmity. The crux of a Bruton violation is the introduction of s…
• Glasserman v. State, 590 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …appellant’s prepared defenses. An information serves the important function of placing the accused on notice and giving him or her an opportunity to adequately prepare a defense. Johnson v. State, 190 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1967). Because the state asked for the amendment only after defense counsel delivered discovery material on the day of trial, we do not find that the trial judge abused his discretion when he granted the amendment. However, once the trial jud…

Authorities Cited

• Denmark v. State, 189 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)