KELLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1972)
• United States v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Mich., 407 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1972)
  …f the case. ..After- concluding that it had jurisdiction,3 that ‘court held that the surveillance was unlawful and that the District Court had properly .required disclosure of the overheard conversations, 444 F. 2d 651 (1971). We granted certiorari, 403 U. S. 930. I Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, 18 U. S. C. §§ 2510-2520, authorizes the use of electronic surveillance for classes of crimes care [*302] fully specified in 18 U. S. C. § 2516. Such surveillance is subject to prior…
• Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1972)
  …me Court, held that § 26-6303, on its face, was unconstitutionally vague and broad and set aside appellee’s conviction. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. 431 F. 2d 855 (1970). We noted probable jurisdiction of the State’s appeal, 403 U. S. 930 (1971). We affirm. Section 26-6303 punishes only spoken words. It can therefore withstand appellee’s attack upon its facial constitutionality only if, as authoritatively construed by the Georgia courts, it is not susceptible of application to spee…