LANE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Billiteri v. United States Bd. OF Parole & Members of the United States Bd. of Parole, 541 F.2d 938 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …arole Board the sole power to grant or deny parole. 18 U.S.C. § 4203. Buchanan v. Clark, 446 F. 2d 1379, 1380 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 979, 92 S.Ct. 347, 30 L.Ed.2d 294 (1971); Tarlton v. Clark, 441 F. 2d 384, 385 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 934, 91 S.Ct. 2263, 29 L.Ed.2d 713 (1971); Thompkins v. United States Bd. of Parole, 427 F. 2d 222, 223 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Frederick, 405 F. 2d 129 (3rd Cir. 1968). “The courts are without power to grant a parole or to judicially determi…
• United States v. Hawkins, 811 F.2d 210 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …weapon or device. — U.S. at —, 106 S.Ct. at 2417-19. This circuit, among others, has examined § 2113(d) and held that it creates a separate offense, not merely a sentencing factor. United States v. Harvey, 439 F. 2d 142, 143 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 934, 91 S.Ct. 2264, 29 L.Ed.2d 713 (1971); see also United States v. McKenzie, 414 F. 2d 808, 811 (3d Cir.1969). The enhanced offense in § 1202(a) resembles § 2113(d) much more closely than the Pennsylvania statute construed in McMillan in that it rais…
• Conklin Wallace v. Christensen, 802 F.2d 1539 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …terminations by the (then) Parole Board. Several courts had held that these decisions, and the Board’s decision-making processes, were unreviewable. See, e.g., Pickus, 507 F. 2d at 1113; Tarlton v. Clark, 441 F. 2d 384, 385 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 934, 91 S.Ct. 2263, 29 L.Ed.2d 713 (1971); Thompkins v. United States Board of Parole, 427 F. 2d 222-23 (5th Cir.1970). Other courts had stated that these decisions were reviewable for abuse of discretion. Dye, 558 F. 2d at 1378 (recognizing commitmen…