DAWSON

v.

WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Gustafson v. State, 273 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
  …anda, then a confession, which is a product of the prior illegally obtained statements, is the fruit of the poisonous tree, and consequently inadmissible. See French v. State, supra. See also Fisher v. Scafati, 439 F. 2d 307 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 403 U.S. 939, 91 S.Ct. 2256, 29 L.Ed.2d 719 (1971) (order of district court was reinstated by Supreme Court that Fisher be discharged unless “timely retried without use of the tainted evidence”); Harney v. United States, 407 F. 2d 586 (5th Cir. 1969); Killough v…
• Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (U.S. 1985)
  …n. 29, infra. See, e. g., United States v. Lee, 699 F. 2d 466, 468-469 (CA9 1982); United States v. Nash, 563 F. 2d 1166, 1169 (CA5 1977); Randall v. Estelle, 492 F. 2d 118, 120 (CA5 1974); Fisher v. Scafati, 439 F. 2d 307, 311 (CAI), cert. denied, 403 U. S. 939 (1971); United States v. Pierce, 397 F. 2d 128, 130-131 (CA4 1968); Evans v. United States, 375 F. 2d 355, 360-361 (CA8 1967), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 (1968); United States ex rel. Sanders v. Rowe, 460…
• United States v. Masse, 816 F.2d 805 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …1st Cir.1987); Fisher v. Scafati, 439 F. 2d 307, 310 (1st Cir.) (“[c]ustody, in the Miranda sense, must require at least some objective manifestation that the defendant was ‘deprived of his freedom of action in [a] significant way’ ”), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 939, 91 S.Ct. 2256, 29 L.Ed.2d 719 (1971). Whether a restraint of freedom triggers Miranda must be determined by objective standards.5 See, e.g., Podlaski, 677 F. 2d at 9; Borodine v. Douzanis, 592 F. 2d 1202, 1206 (1st Cir.1979). Although no mechanical…