NEW YORK TIMES CO.
v.
UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court granted certiorari and set oral argument, while also granting a stay of mandate pending further order and continuing a restraint.
The case involves an application for a stay of mandate from the Court of Appeals, with specific filing requirements and a continued restraint on the N…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Oral Argument cases and more on FLexlaw
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument on Saturday, June 26, 1971, at 11 a. m. Briefs and records shall be filed simultaneously, the requirement for printing being waived.
Application of New York Times Co-, for stay of mandate of .Court of Appeals granted pending further order of this Court. The Special Appendix referred to in the order , of the Court of Appeals,, and any additional items as the Uqited States may have specified with particularity, shall be served on New York Times Co. and filed in this Court by 5 p. m. today, June 25, 1971. Restraint imposed upon New York Times Co. by the Court of Appeals continued pending, argument and decision.
For purposes of argument this case is consolidated with No. 1885, United States v. Washington Post Co., certiorari granted; infra. Portions of record or argument relating to matters, claimed to affect national security may be filed in sealed form.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the motion to vacate order of Court of Appeals except insofar as it affirms judgment of the District Court, would not continue' restraint imposed upon'New York Times Co. by the Court of Appeals, and would deny the petition for certiorari.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGUIRE, 512 F.2d 918 (D.C. Cir. 1974)…sider the subject matter of the petition for mandamus. Although it is well established that a transferee court cannot directly review the transfer order itself, Illinois Tool Works v. Sweetheart Plastics, 436 F. 2d 1180 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 403 U.S. 942, 91 S.Ct. 2270, 29 L.Ed.2d 722 (1971); Purex Corp. v. St. Louis Nat’l Stockyards, 374 F. 2d 999 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 824, 88 S.Ct. 59, 19 L.Ed.2d 77 (1967); Preston Corp. v. Raese, 335 F. 2d 827 (4th Cir. 1964); In re Southwestern Mobi…
-
Coleman v. Paccar Inc., 424 U.S. 1301 (U.S. 1976)…ppeals. Since the case is “in” the court of appeals within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. § 1254, the Court would presumably have jurisdiction to grant the writ if it chose to do so in the exercise of its discretion. New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U. S. 942 (1971). See also Far East Conference v. United States, 342 U. S. 570 (1952). But the exercise of such power by the Court is an extremely rare occurrence. Supreme Court Rule 20. The losing litigant might likewise proceed by a motion to vacate the st…
-
Cool-Fin Elecs. Corp. v. Int'l Elec. Research Corp., 491 F.2d 660 (9th Cir. 1974)…ght of the drawings in the file folder, which show leaf spring angular contacts, both claims include the notion of area contact. . Accord Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Sweetheart Plastics, Inc., 436 F. 2d 1180, 1182-1183 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 403 U.S. 942, 91 S.Ct. 2270, 29 L.Ed.2d 722 (1971) ; Walker v. General Motors Corp., 362 F. 2d 56, 58 (9th Cir. 1966) ; McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F. 2d 381, 398 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933, 86 S.Ct. 1061, 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (196…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence