MCGAUTHA

v.

CALIFORNIA; AND CRAMPTON V. OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Grossman v. State, 525 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1988)
  …ght given to the jury’s recommendation to its reflection of the conscience or judgment of the community. . The mandate of the Court in McGautha was later withheld and the judgment vacated and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Furman. 403 U.S. 951, 91 S.Ct. 2273, 29 L.Ed.2d 862; [Crampton v. Ohio], 408 U.S. 941, 92 S.Ct. 2873, 33 L.Ed.2d 765 (1972). . In this connection, see Adams v. Wainwright, 804 F. 2d 1526 (11th Cir.1986), modified by Adams v. Dugger, 816 F. 2d 1493 (11th Cir.1987), and…
• Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (U.S. 1972)
• Garland Wayne Kelly and Allen Eugene Kelly, Sr. v. Smith, 485 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …tion concerning the precise location of the Arkansas-Mississippi boundary, Anderson-Tully Co. v. Walls, 266 F.Supp. 804 (N.D.Miss.1967); Arkansas Land & Cattle Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co., 248 Ark. 495, 452 S.W. 2d 632 (1970); Mississippi v. Arkansas, 403 U.S. 951, 91 S.Ct. 2273, 29 L.Ed.2d 862 (1971), but the parties to this action agreed that the incident in this case occurred in Mississippi. . Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U.S. 469, 42 S.Ct. 157, 66 L.Ed. 321 (1922); State Indust. Comm. v. Nor…