PEASE
v.
HANSEN, DIRECTOR, CASCADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, ET AL.

U.S. | 1971-11-16
No. 70-5376
404 U.S. 70 Supreme Court of the United States (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Whether a welfare program is or is not federally funded is irrelevant to the constitutional principles enunciated in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mem'l Hosp. v. Maricopa Cnty., 415 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1974)
    …Maricopa County has received federal funding for its public hospital18 but, more importantly, this Court has held that whether or not a welfare program is federally funded is irrelevant to the applicability of the Shapiro analysis. Pease v. Hansen, 404 U. S. 70 (1971); Graham v. Richardson, 403 U. S. 365 (1971). Not unlike the admonition of the Bible that, “Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country,” Leviticus 24:22 (King James Version), the right of interst…
  • Brandenburger v. Myron B. Thompson, 494 F.2d 885 (9th Cir. 1974)
    …ment for plaintiff. . Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia. . Nor did it make any difference on the constitutional issue that the Hawaii welfare program was entirely state funded, rather than federally assisted. Pease v. Hansen, 404 U.S. 70, 92 S.Ct. 318, 30 L.Ed.2d 224 (1971) (per curiam) ; Cf. Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160, 175, 62 S.Ct. 164, 86 L.Ed. 119 (1941). . The then Attorney General, in fact, issued a legal opinion immediately prior to the time the bill was signed into…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw