BRADLEY
v.
UNITED STATES
BRADLEY
UNITED STATES
404 U.S. 567
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 30 L. Ed. 2d 722 · 92 S. Ct. 746 · SCDB 1971-051 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 3831
Cited by 38 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa with directions to dismiss the indictment. Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481 (1971).
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Blackmun dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Blackmun’s dissenting opinion in Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481, 483-485 (1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
United States v. Spedalieri, 910 F.2d 707 (10th Cir. 1990)…jury.” Crouthers, 669 F. 2d at 639 (quoting Beasley, 438 F. 2d at 1282). In adopting the Beasley reasonable person standard, we rejected the objective test of Bradley v. United States, 447 F. 2d 264, 274-75 (8th Cir.1971), vacated due to abatement, 404 U.S. 567, 92 S.Ct. 746, 30 L.Ed.2d 722 (1972), which would require that the instrumentality used by a bank robber be objectively capable of causing actual physical harm. Crouthers, 669 F. 2d at 639; see also United States v. Shannahan, 605 F. 2d 539, 542 (10…
-
Arland L. Gerberding v. United States, 471 F.2d 55 (8th Cir. 1973)…6, 995 (1958). Another group of courts, including our own, has adhered to what might be called “the intention of the sentencing court” theory. See Bradley v. United States, 447 F. 2d 264, 272 n. 13 (8th Cir. 1971) (dictum), vacated on other grounds, 404 U.S. 567, 92 S.Ct. 746, 30 L.Ed.2d 722 (1972); Jones v. United States, 396 F. 2d 66, 69 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1057, 89 S.Ct. 695, 21 L.Ed.2d 697 (1969); Sawyer v. United States, 312 F. 2d 24, 26 (8th Cir. 1963). Cf. Green v. United States,…
-
United States v. Cady, 495 F.2d 742 (8th Cir. 1974)…bsection (a),4 which prohibits robbery “by force and violence, or by intimidation.” United States v. Marshall, 427 F. 2d 434 (2d Cir. 1970). This court reached a similar conclusion in Bradley v. United States, 447 F. 2d 264 (8th Cir. 1971), vacated, 404 U.S. 567, 92 S.Ct. 746, 30 L.Ed.2d 722 (1972), which involved the use of a simulated bomb.5 For a contrary result, see United States v. Beasley, 438 F. 2d 1279 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 866, 92 S.Ct. 124, 30 L.Ed.2d 110 (1971). [*745] (d) Whoever, i…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481 (U.S. 1971)