ADMIRAL-MERCHANTS MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. NEW York, 413 U.S. 345 (U.S. 1973)
  …t did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion. See Apache County v. United States, 256 F. Supp. 903 (DC 1966); United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 333 F. Supp. 1100 (SDNY), aff’d sub nom. Syufy Enterprises v. United States, 404 U. S. 802 (1971). This makes it unnecessary for us to consider whether other conditions for intervention under Rule 24 were satisfied. Affirmed. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. “To assure that the right of c…
• Schapansky v. Dep't OF Transp., 735 F.2d 477 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …f striking is proven when it is shown that the employee withheld his services in concert with others, regardless of whether the employee joined a picket line. See United Federation of Postal Clerks v. Blount, 325 F.Supp. 879, 884 (D.D.C.), affirmed, 404 U.S. 802, 92 S.Ct. 80, 30 L.Ed.2d 38 (1972). The Board did not, as amici assert, accept mere absence during a strike as proof of the charges. On the contrary, as appears below, it took into account all of the facts and circumstances. The Board’s decision was…
• United Steelworkers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Univ. OF Ala., 599 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …area is clear. There is a unanimity of opinion on the part of courts and legislatures that government employees do not have the right to strike. See United Federation of Postal Clerks v. Blount, 325 F.Supp. 879 (D.D.C.1971) (three judge court) aff’d 404 U.S. 802, 92 S.Ct. 80, 30 L.Ed.2d 38 (1971). It is equally clear that while public employees may be barred from striking, this prohibition may not interfere with their rights which are fundamental and constitutionally protected. “The right to organize collec…