JEFFERSON ET AL.

v.

HACKNEY, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WELFARE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1972)
  …, as applied to him, the ordinances had punished constitutionally protected activity. The Supreme Court of Illinois held that both ordinances were constitutional on their face. 46 Ill. 2d 492, 263 N. E. 2d 866 (1970). We noted probable jurisdiction, 404 U. S. 820 (1971). We conclude that the antipicketing ordinance is unconstitutional, but affirm the court below with respect to the antinoise ordinance. [*107] I At the time of appellant’s arrest and conviction, Rockford’s antipicketing ordinance provided tha…
• Jefferson v. Hackney, 406 U.S. 535 (U.S. 1972)
  …hat reduction violate the congressional enactment. The District Court rejected this argument and denied without opinion appellants’ motion to amend the judgment. This appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1253 then followed, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 404 U. S. 820 (1971). II Appellants’ statutory argument relates to the method that the State uses to compute the percentage reduction when the recipient also has some outside income. Texas, like many other States,4 first applies the percentage-reduction factor…
• First Nat'l City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759 (U.S. 1972)
  …ent of State which had been furnished to us following the filing of the petition for certiorari. 400 U. S. 1019 (1971). [*762] Upon reconsideration, the Court of Appeals by a divided vote adhered to its earlier decision. We again granted certiorari. 404 U. S. 820 (1971). We must here decide whether, in view of the substantial difference between the position taken in this case by the Executive Branch and that which it took in Sabbatino, the act of state doctrine prevents petitioner from litigating its counte…

  ← 1 / 2 →