GORDON

v.

ADCOCK

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Jackson, 549 F.2d 517 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …n is whether the existence of a conspiracy was established. “The offense of conspiracy consists of an agreement between the conspirators to effect the object of the,conspiracy.” United States v. Skillman, 442 F. 2d 542, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 833, 92 S.Ct. 82, 30 L.Ed.2d 63 (1971). The agreement need not be express or formal. It may be established by circumstantial evidence. United States v. Hutchinson, supra at 490; Koolish v. United States, 340 F. 2d 513, 523-24 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 3…
• United States v. Lloyde W. Richmond, Jr., 700 F.2d 1183 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …e United States, attended by an act of one or more of the conspirators to effect the object of the conspiracy.” United States v. Pintar, 630 F. 2d 1270, 1275 (8th Cir.1980). See United States v. Skillman, 442 F. 2d 542, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 833, 92 S.Ct. 82, 30 L.Ed.2d 63 (1971). This court has long recognized that the agreement need not be [*1190] formal or express, and that a tacit understanding may be sufficient to constitute a conspiratorial agreement. United States v. Pintar, supra, 6…
• United States v. Arpan, 887 F.2d 873 (8th Cir. 1989)
  …on is a correct statement of the law, especially when given prior to the [*875] commencement of deliberations. Potter v. United States, 691 F. 2d 1275, 1276 n. 1 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Skillman, 442 F. 2d 542, 559 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 833, 92 S.Ct. 82, 30 L.Ed.2d 63 (1971). It is also an acceptable variation of Instruction 7.01, part Second, Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions for the Eighth Circuit (Rev. ed. 1986), a publication prepared by a committee of district judges of t…

  ← 1 / 2 →