GEBHART

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Sanders v. The United States, 594 F.2d 804 (Ct. Cl. 1979)
  …y but automatic. * * * Elsewhere we have said that where an applicant has convinced a correction board to correct his record it must not grant him “half-a-loaf” of relief. DeBow v. United States, 434 F. 2d 1333, 193 Ct.Cl. 499 (1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 846, 92 S.Ct. 150, 30 L.Ed.2d 84 (1971). He must be made “whole.” Ray v. United States, 453 F. 2d 754, 197 Ct.Cl. 1 (1972). In general, “[m]ilitary correction boards ‘have an abiding moral sanction to determine, insofar as possible, the true nature…
• United States v. Boyd, 610 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …The mere fact that there is hostility among the defendants, or one defendant may try to save himself at the expense of another is not sufficient grounds to require separate trials. United States v. Barber, 442 F. 2d 517, 530 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 846, 92 S.Ct. 148, 30 L.Ed.2d 83 (1971); United States v. Hutul, 416 F. 2d 607, 620-21 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1012, 90 S.Ct. 573, 24 L.Ed.2d 504 (1970); Dauer v. United States, 189 F. 2d 343, 344 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 898,…
• United States v. Alverson, 666 F.2d 341 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …is question and concluded that Congress intended each firearm to be a unit of prosecution under section 5861(d). United States v. Tarrant, 460 F. 2d 701, 704 (5th Cir. 1972); Sanders v. United States, 441 F. 2d 412, 414-15 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 846, 92 S.Ct. 147, [*347] 30 L.Ed.2d 82 (1971). To interpret the statute, we “must look to the wording of the provision violated ..., the overall statutory scheme, and the legislative history.” Brown v. United States, 623 F. 2d 54, 57 (9th Cir. 1980) (f…