WORKMAN

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bell, 476 F.2d 1046 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …benefit. See United States v. Foster, 439 F. 2d 29, 31 (9th Cir. 1971). As such the delay could not possibly have prejudiced the defendant. Luster, supra, 422 F. 2d at 570; United States v. Watson, 442 F. 2d 1273, 1278 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 848, 92 S.Ct. 152, 30 L.Ed.2d 85. Furthermore, and more importantly, it is well established that the one-hundred-twenty (120) day limitation on postponements under Section 1632.2 does not apply to a registrant who has failed to appear for and submit to…
• United States v. Harmon, 486 F.2d 363 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …s not a custody situation or one which was attended by circumstances of pressure and compulsion. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1967); United States v. Watson, 442 F. 2d 1273, 1282 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 848, 92 S.Ct. 152, 30 L.Ed.2d 85 (1971) ; United States v. Kroll, 402 F. 2d 221, 223 (3d Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 1043, 89 S.Ct. 672, 21 L.Ed.2d 592 (1969); Noland v. United States, 380 F. 2d 1016, 1017 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 389 U.S. 945,…