GEORGE W. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE UNION BANK, A TENNESSEE BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
GEORGE W. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
THE UNION BANK, A TENNESSEE BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
197 So. 2d 307
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Anderson v. Ax, 104 Fla. 294, 139 So. 798; Falk v. Salario, 108 Fla. 135, 146 So. 193; Chase Manhattan Bank v. Marger, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 709; § 52.08, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1974)…those two cases have no relation to the dismissal of one count of a complaint. Respondents further contend the law in Florida is that the dismissal of less than all counts of a complaint is an interlocutory order under authority of Jacobs v. Gould, 197 So. 2d 307 (Fla.App.2d 1967), and that only when the entire complaint with all its counts is disposed of, and only then, is the plaintiff left with a right of appeal. Further, Respondents contend the plaintiff-petitioner’s claims in all counts arise from the s…
-
Talmudical Acad. OF Baltimore v. Harris, 238 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…court of record. An order that disposes of a portion of a claim made in a complaint is interlocutory. Goldfarb v. Bronston, 154 Fla. 180, 17 So. 2d 300 (1944); Morse v. Hendry Corporation, Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 31; Jacobs v. Gould, Fla.App.1967, 197 So. 2d 307. Our courts have accepted for review on petition for certio-rari circuit court orders in common law cases that dispose of a portion of a complaint and transfer the remaining portion of the claim to courts with lesser jurisdictional amounts. See Easl…
Authorities Cited
- Anderson v. Ax, 104 Fla. 294 (Fla. 1932)
- Falk v. Salario, 108 Fla. 135 (Fla. 1933)
- Lillar Elleby v. Stoutamire, 108 Fla. 151 (Fla. 1933)
- The Chase Manhattan Bank v. Marger, 184 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)