CUNNINGHAM

v.

BRIERLEY, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Thomas Johnson v. Chairman OF NEW York State Bd. OF Parole & Comm'r of N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. Servs., 500 F.2d 925 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …ndue risk of further anti-social activity. The significance of the distinction between parole release and parole revocation proceedings was later noted by us in United States ex rel. Bey v. Connecticut, 443 F2d 1079, 1086 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot, 404 U.S. 879, 92 S.Ct. 196, 30 LEd.2d 159 (1971). A second ground for our decision in Menechino was that since New York had granted almost absolute power to the Board to deny parole and the prisoner did not presently enjoy any liberty, he lacked a sufficient “i…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Childs v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 511 F.2d 1270 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …nia, where Childs was incarcerated, had been denied. No contest as to that decision is before us. . The several complaints allege that each plaintiff is a federal prisoner who “has been or is now an applicant for parole . . . .” . Vacated as moot, 404 U.S. 879, 92 S.Ct. 196, 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971). . Although not explicitly doing so, the King decision thus seems to depart from a 1973 case in the same Circuit, Farries v. United States Board of Parole, 484 F. 2d 948 (7th Cir. 1973), where the court had stat…
• Cardaropoli v. Norton, 523 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …. 1267, 1278 (1975); Frost v. Weinberger, 515 F. 2d 57, 66 (2d Cir. 1975). See also Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 442, 80 S.Ct. 1502, 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960); United States ex rel. Bey v. Connecticut, 443 F. 2d 1079, 1086 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot, 404 U.S. 879, 92 S.Ct. 196, 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971); Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F. 2d 178, 196 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049, 92 S.Ct. 719, 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972). The Supreme Court recently reminded us that “[t]he touchstone of due process is protectio…