SOUTHERS

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Schnadig Corp. v. Gaines Mfg. Co., Inc., 494 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …eous standard is inapplicable to the extent that findings rest on documentary evidence. The law in this Circuit is well settled to the contrary. See H. K. Porter Co., Inc. v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 437 F. 2d 244, 246 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 885, 92 S.Ct. 203, 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971); United States Steel Corp. v. Fuhrman, 407 F. 2d 1143, 1145-1146 (6th Cir. 1969), cert, denied, 398 U.S. 958, 90 S.Ct. 2162, 26 L.Ed.2d 542 (1970); Commissioner v. Spermacet Whaling & Shipping Co., S/A, 281 F. 2d…
• United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …t merit. “[T]he mere subsequency of an act to that charged in an indictment does not on that ground alone make it incompetent to establish intent or motive . . . .” McConkey v. United States, 444 F. 2d 788, 790 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 885, 92 S.Ct. 223, 30 L.Ed.2d 168 (1971). Further, although the challenged evidence was indeed prejudicial to appellant, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that its probative value outweighed its prejudicial impact…
• K & M Joint Venture v. Smith Int'l, Inc., 669 F.2d 1106 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …21 (6th Cir. 1960); United States Steel Corporation v. Fuhrman, 407 F. 2d 1143 (6th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 958, 90 S.Ct. 2162, 26 L.Ed.2d 542 (1970); H. K. Porter Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 437 F. 2d 244 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 885, 92 S.Ct. 203, 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971); Ingram Corp. v. Ohio River Co., 505 F. 2d 1364 (6th Cir. 1974); Schnadig v. Gaines Mfg. Co., 494 F. 2d 383 (6th Cir. 1974); Ray v. Rose, 535 F. 2d 966, 973 (6th Cir. 1976); Eliason v. National Sanitation Foundat…