RIGDON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Panduit Corp. v. Dennison Mfg. Co., 810 F.2d 1561 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
  …(2d Cir.1974); Flour City Architectural Metals v. Alpana Aluminum Products, Inc., 454 F. 2d 98, 105-06, 172 USPQ 341, 345-48 (8th Cir.1972); Kolene Corp. v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc., 440 F. 2d 77, 81, 169 USPQ 77, 80 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 886, 92 S.Ct. 203, 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971); Swafford v.B&W, Inc., 395 F. 2d 362, 367, 158 USPQ 72, 76 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 935, 89 S.Ct. 296, 21 L.Ed.2d 272 (1968); In re Sporck, 301 F. 2d 686, 690, 49 CCPA 1039, 1043, 133 USPQ 360, 364 (196…
• Schnadig Corp. v. Gaines Mfg. Co., Inc., 494 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …ent validity is one of law and, accordingly, is not subject to the confines of the [*388] clearly erroneous test mandated by Fed. R.Civ.P. 52(a). See, e. g., Kolene Corp. v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc., 440 F. 2d 77, 81 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 886, 92 S.Ct. 203, 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971). However, findings bearing on novelty and unobviousness, insofar as they rest upon factual issues, are subject to the clearly erroneous rule. As we stated in Kolene, supra: “The question of ‘obviousness’ in dete…
• United States v. Clayborne Jamison, Jr., 505 F.2d 407 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …ssed over incidents of possible prosecutorial vindictiveness without discussion of Pearce’s applicability to the prosecutor. See Taylor v. United States, 475 F. 2d 1121 (6th Cir. 1973); Percy v. South Dakota, 443 F. 2d 1232 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 886, 92 S.Ct. 223, 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971). On the other hand, the Fifth Circuit held even prior to Pearce that to bring an increase charge in retaliation for a defendant’s seeking federal habeas relief placed an “impermissible burden” on the exercise of…