THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS AND CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY OF PINELLAS, INCLUDING NON-RESIDENTS OWNING PROPERTY OR SUBJECT TO TAXATION THEREIN, APPELLANTS,
v.
COUNTY OF PINELLAS, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Supreme Court upheld a county's issuance of $1.3 million in revenue anticipation bonds to construct an office building for the Pinellas County Health Department. The court rejected constitutional challenges that the bonds were unauthorized because the Health Board members were not properly elected or appointed.
The court affirmed the issuance of the bonds, holding that the health unit is a proper county function and that there is no illegality in the bond proceeding. The court declined to determine whether Health Board members were properly appointed, finding no constitutional defect in the county's authority to issue the bonds.
“if the members of Pinellas Health Board are officers of the County, the county has authority to issue the bonds”
Establishes the legal standard: county bonding authority depends on whether Health Board members are county officers
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Pinellas County Health Board was created under special legislation with members selected from various cities and organizations. The Board of Count…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Under Chapter 24827, Special Acts of Florida, 1947, the Pinellas County Health Board was created composed of persons according to their residence in certain cities, and their membership in various organizations who were to be certified to the Board. For instance, one member was to be selected by Pinellas County Medical Association and one from the residents of Tarpon Springs chosen by the governing body of that City.
The act which is immediately involved in this litigation is Chapter 24819, Laws of Florida, Special Acts of 1947, providing that Pinellas County through its Board of County Commissioners is authorized and empowered to acquire sites for offices, *502and offices for occupancy by such officers, as the Board of County Commissioners shall determine to be necessary for the proper performance of their duties. This act also providés that for the purpose of acquiring, constructing or equipping such sites and buildings the Board of County Commissioners may issue and sell Revenue Anticipation Bonds of the county.
Under authority of this act the County Commissioners resolved to issue $1,300,000 in bonds, the proceeds of which are to be used to erect an office building in St. Petersburg to house the Pinellas County Health Department. A decree was entered by the Judge of the Circuit Court validating and confirming the bonds. From this decree comes an appeal to this court.
At the outset the appellants readily concede that if the members of Pinellas Health Board are officers of the County, the county has authority to issue the bonds, but, they contend such is not the case. This, they say, cannot be so because by Sec. 27, Art. Ill, of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A., the legislature is mandated to “provide for the election by the people or appointment by the Governor of all State and county officers.”
So, judging by appellant’s first question, it is argued that because the members of the Health Board are not legally selected the Board of County Commissioners do not have the authority to issue tire bonds for the construction of a building to accommodate the health unit.
The appellant has been at pains to demonstrate who are and who are not public officers but we agree with the Circuit Judge that the health unit as such is a proper county function and there is no occasion now to determine whether or not the eventual occupants of the proposed building or the members of the Health Board who supervise these activities will have been legally appointed.
Our examination in the light of appellant’s challenge has not revealed any illegality in the proceeding so the decree approving the issue of bonds is—
Affirmed.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.