PARHAM ET AL.

v.

CORTESE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1972)
  …nt on the procedural issue, ordering the University officials to provide him with reasons and a hearing. 310 F. Supp. 972. The Court of Appeals, with one judge dissenting, affirmed this partial summary judgment. 446 F. 2d 806. We granted certiorari. 404 U. S. 909. The only question presented to us at this stage in the case is whether the respondent had a constitutional right to a statement of reasons and a hearing on the University’s decision not to rehire him for another year.6 We hold that he did not. I…
• Rabe v. Washington, 405 U.S. 313 (U.S. 1972)
  …and arrested petitioner for violating Washington’s obscenity statute. Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68.010. Petitioner was later convicted and, on appeal, the Supreme Court of Washington affirmed. 79 Wash. 2d 254, 484 P. 2d 917 (1971). We granted certiorari. 404 U. S. 909. We reverse petitioner’s conviction. The statute under which petitioner was convicted, Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68.010, made criminal the knowing display of “obscene” motion pictures: “Every person who— “(1) Having knowledge of the contents thereof sh…
• James v. The Bd. OF Educ. OF Cent. Dist. NO. 1 OF the Towns OF Addison, 461 F.2d 566 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …ding, we find it unnecessary to decide whether the Board of Education violated James’s due process rights by not affording him an evidentiary hearing before he was dismissed. Compare Roth v. Board of Regents, 446 F. 2d 806 (7th Cir.), cert. granted, 404 U.S. 909, 92 S.Ct. 227, 30 L.Ed.2d 181 (1971), and Sindermann v. Perry, 430 F. 2d 939 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. granted, 403 U.S. 917, 91 S.Ct. 2226, 29 L.Ed.2d 694 (1971) (a probationary teacher has a right to a hearing when he has a colorable claim that his d…