PRUETT

v.

TEXAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (U.S. 1977)
  …ent initiated conversation with suspect, provoking damaging admission); United States v. Menichino, 497 F. 2d 935, 939-941 (CA5 1974) (incriminating statements volunteered during booking process); Haire v. Sarver, 437 F. 2d 1262 (CA8), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 910 (1971) (statements volunteered in response to questioning of defendant’s wife). When there is no interrogation, such statements should be admissible as long as they are truly voluntary.3 The Massiah point thus being of no consequence, I would vacat…
• United States v. DOG, 532 F.2d 1182 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …andard employed in determining whether prejudice has taken place as a result of pre-indictment delay is “whether the delay has impaired the defendant’s ability to defend himself.” United States v. Golden, 436 F. 2d 941, 943 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 236, 30 L.Ed.2d 183 (1971). See also United States v. Jackson, 504 F. 2d 337 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 964, 95 S.Ct. 1356, 43 L.Ed.2d 442 (1975). We agree with the district court’s finding that there has been no showing to su…
• United States v. Jackson, 504 F.2d 337 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …such informants and agents confidential, both to protect their safety and to continue to use them effectively. See, United States v. Emory, 468 F. 2d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 1972) ; United States v. Golden, 436 F. 2d 941, 945 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 236, 30 L.Ed.2d 183 (1971). However, when the government chooses to continue the use of a particular informant and delay the indictment of an individual already suspected of an offense, it must recognize and respect the suspect’s “acceler…

  ← 1 / 2 →