COMMITTEE FOR NUCLEAR RESPONSIBILITY, INC., ET AL.

v.

SCHLESINGER, CHAIRMAN OF ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Env't Prot. Agency v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73 (U.S. 1973)
  …onsibility v. Seaborg (DC, Civ. Action No. 1346-71). After adverse decisions below, plaintiffs in that case applied for an injunction in this Court. On November 6, 1971, we denied the application, Committee for Nuclear Responsibility v. Schlesinger, 404 U. S. 917, and the test was conducted that same day. It should be noted that in the District Court respondents stated that they “have exhausted their administrative remedies [and] . . . have complied with all applicable regulations.” Petitioners did not cont…
• Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Corps OF Eng'rs OF the United States Army, 470 F.2d 289 (8th Cir. 1972)
  …ons as to the ‘rightness’ of the project under consideration.” 342 F.Supp. at 1223. The test of compliance with § 102, then, is one of good faith objectivity rather than subjective impartiality. Committee for Nuclear Responsibility v. Schlesinger, 404 U.S. 917, 918, 92 S.Ct. 242, 30 L.Ed.2d 191 (1971) (Douglas, J., dissenting from denial of injunction); Committee for Nuclear Responsibility v. Seaborg, 463 F. 2d 783 (D.C. Cir. 1971); Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission,…
• Bertram Zweibon v. Mitchell, 516 F.2d 594 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …eeding. . See also note 7. supra. . See also, e. g., Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. Seaborg, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 390-392 & n.12, 463 F. 2d 788, 793-795 & n.12 (per curiam), application for injunction in aid of jurisdiction denied, 404 U.S. 917, 92 S.Ct. 242, 30 L.Ed.2d 191 (1971). . See also New York Times Co. v. United States, supra note 2, 403 U.S. at 716, 91 S.Ct. at 2142 (Black, J., concurring): [T]he Solicitor General argues and some members of the Court appear to agree that the ge…