BARNES

v.

LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• David v. NEW York Tel. Co., 470 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …. Rptr. 455, 481 P. 2d 823 (1971), and the United States Supreme Court after considering that argument (see Appellant’s Jurisdictional Statement filed in the United States Supreme Court at 7-13), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. 404 U.S. 931, 92 S.Ct. 293, 30 L.Ed.2d 245 (1971). Since jurisdiction under § 1343(3) depends on the statement of a substantial federal question (Almenares v. Wyman, 453 F. 2d 1075, 1082 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 962, 30 L.Ed.2d 815…
• Teleco, Inc. v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 511 F.2d 949 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …gated legislative function and does not adjudicate factual disputes so as to invoke the due process requirements of notice and hearing. Wood v. Public Utilities Commission, 4 Cal.3d 288, 93 Cal.Rptr. 455, 481 P. 2d 823, 825 (Cal.), appeal dismissed, 404 U.S. 931, 92 S.Ct. 293, 30 L.Ed.2d 245. See also Mississippi Fuel Corp. v. F. P. C., 108 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 281 F. 2d 919, 927; Sun Oil Co. v. F. P. C., 5 Cir., 256 F. 2d 233, 240-41; K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.02 et seq. (1958). Accordingly…