DINGEE

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …med the judge that it cannot agree . . . but also when [as in the present case] the judge has learned that the jury was deadlocked 11 to 1 in favor of conviction. . . . ” United States v. Martinez, 446 F. 2d 118, 119-20 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 297, 30 L.Ed.2d 259 (1971). As Judge Moore stated in United States v. Meyers, 410 F. 2d 693, 697 (2d Cir.), where the jury also had advised the trial judge it was deadlocked 11 to 1: “The judge’s warning that ‘under no circumstances must…
• United States v. Bermudez, 526 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …tates v. Rao, 394 F. 2d 354, 355 (2d Cir. 1968). See also United States v. Tyers, 487 F. 2d 828, 832 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 971, 94 S.Ct. 1995, 40 L.Ed.2d 560 (1974); United States v. Martinez, 446 F. 2d 118 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 297, 30 L.Ed.2d 259 (1971). We can find nothing in the charge in this case which exceeds this permissible encouragement to the jurors to pursue their deliberations toward a verdict, if possible, in order to avoid the expense and delay of a…
• United States v. Lenin Juarez and Oscar Juarez, 573 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …v. Hayes,-U.S.-, 98 S.Ct. 663, 54 L.Ed.2d 604 (1978). The third objection to the admission of the tapes is that they were inaudible and unintelligible and therefore unreliable. In United States v. Avila, 5 Cir., 443 F. 2d 792, 795-96, cert. denied, 404 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 295, 30 L.Ed.2d 258 (1971), a panel of this Court stated with respect to a similar assertion in that case: Additionally it is argued that the tapes should have been excluded because they were in a foreign language and were inaudible in ma…