JOHN LESTER COLLIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the conviction of John Lester Collier for larceny of cattle, finding that the trial court had jurisdiction to adjudicate guilt and sentence him approximately three years after the jury verdict. The court noted that the issues raised were substantially the same as those previously decided in a related appeal.
Yes, the trial court had jurisdiction to adjudicate guilt and sentence John Lester Collier approximately three years after the jury found him guilty.
“The same points raised by John Lester Collier on this appeal, with one exception, were raised by George Collier on his appeal and are without merit upon the authority of George Collier v. State, supra.”
Establishes that most of the appellant's arguments were already rejected in a prior related appeal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJohn Lester Collier and his father, George Collier, were found guilty by a jury of larceny of cattle. George Collier's appeal was affirmed, and certio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The appellant, John Lester Collier, and his father, George Collier, were found guilty by jury in a trial for larceny of cattle.
George Collier was adjudicated guilty and sentenced. His appeal to this court was affirmed in Collier v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 301, and certiorari to the Supreme Court was denied by order dated June 15, 1966.
The same points raised by John Lester Collier on this appeal, with one exception, were raised by George Collier on his appeal and are without merit upon the authority of George Collier v. State, supra.
The different point raised by John Lester Collier is that he contends the court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate guilt and sentence him approximately three years after he was found guilty by a jury. We find no basis for this contention and affirm.
Affirmed.
ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Arison Shipping Co. v. Smith, 311 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…indeed swayed by the improper remarks, and must have so gravely impaired the jury’s dispassionate consideration as to deny the defendant a fair trial. H. I. Holding Company v. Dade County, Fla.App.1961, 129 So. 2d 693; Byrd v. Felder, Fla.App.1967, 197 So. 2d 554, 555. Defendant contends that there was no particular remark or instance per se that constituted error but that the aggregate of the prejudicial statements constituted reversible error. In our opinion there is no prejudicial error either in part or…
-
Aggie Byrd v. Felder, 201 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1967)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 197 So. 2d 554.…
-
Collier v. State, 201 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 1967)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 197 So. 2d 554.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Collier v. State, 183 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
- Jones v. Life Ins. Co. OF Fla., 183 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)