WATSON
v.
CALIFORNIA; INTERCONTINENTAL PROMOTIONS, INC. V. MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK ET AL.; WORTH V. UNITED STATES; MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC. V. UARCO, INC.; JURAS V. MEYERS ET AL.; MASSILLON-CLEVELAND-AKRON SIGN CO. V. GOLDEN STATE ADVERTISING CO., INC., ET AL.; GIBSON V. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.; ALLEN V. BANKERS TRUST CO. ET AL.; FERNANDEZ V. PARKER, WARDEN; JOHNSON V. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., ET AL.; TYMCIO V. OHIO; GRAMES V. MICHIGAN; STODDARD V. STODDARD; BENOIT V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES; HURD V. DIMENTO & SULLIVAN; WELCH V. CARDWELL, WARDEN; LOTT V. MANCUSI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
WATSON
CALIFORNIA; INTERCONTINENTAL PROMOTIONS, INC. V. MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK ET AL.; WORTH V. UNITED STATES; MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC. V. UARCO, INC.; JURAS V. MEYERS ET AL.; MASSILLON-CLEVELAND-AKRON SIGN CO. V. GOLDEN STATE ADVERTISING CO., INC., ET AL.; GIBSON V. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.; ALLEN V. BANKERS TRUST CO. ET AL.; FERNANDEZ V. PARKER, WARDEN; JOHNSON V. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., ET AL.; TYMCIO V. OHIO; GRAMES V. MICHIGAN; STODDARD V. STODDARD; BENOIT V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES; HURD V. DIMENTO & SULLIVAN; WELCH V. CARDWELL, WARDEN; LOTT V. MANCUSI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
404 U.S. 961
Supreme Court of the United States (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gaffney v. Silk, 488 F.2d 1248 (1st Cir. 1973)…ermission to amend a complaint after dismissal of the action rests in the sound discretion of the court, Hurd v. DiMento & Sullivan, 440 F. 2d 1322, 1323 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 862, 92 S.Ct. 164, 30 L. Ed.2d 105 (1971), rehearing denied, 404 U.S. 961, 92 S.Ct. 321, 30 L.Ed.2d 281 (1971), amendment to correct a deficiency in pleading should be “freely given when justice so requires,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Bonanno v. Thomas, 309 F. 2d 320, 322 (9th Cir. 1962); Lone Star Motor Import, Inc. v. Cit…
-
Ricon v. Warden, Sam P. Garrison, Cent. Prison, Raleigh, N. C. & State of N.C., 517 F.2d 628 (4th Cir. 1975)…Court dismissed the claim of violation of the right to a speedy trial primarily because there was no showing of “credible possibility of prejudice” (emphasis in opinion). Certiorari was denied in 404 U.S. 850, 92 S.Ct. 86, 30 L.Ed.2d 89, reh. denied 404 U.S. 961, 92 S.Ct. 307, 30 L.Ed.2d 282, with a dissent in 414 U.S. 919, 94 S.Ct. 215, 38 L.Ed.2d 155. . See Barker, 407 U.S. at p. 530, 92 S.Ct. at p. 2192: “The length of the delay is to some extent a triggering mechanism. Until there is some delay which…