IN RE DISBARMENT OF SAMPLES

Citator

Cited By

• Schweiker v. Hogan, 457 U.S. 569 (U.S. 1982)
  …the 1967 Amendments, see supra, at 577-580, and n. 14, Congress noted that these persons often are able to prepare for future medical expenses [*591] through private insurance or through participation in the Medicare program. In Fullington v. Shea, 404 U. S. 963, this Court affirmed a decision of a three-judge District Court holding that it was constitutional for the State of Colorado to provide benefits to the categorically needy but not to the medically needy. We decided Fullington summarily. It is clear…
• Wyatt v. Aderholt, 503 F.2d 1305 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …tablishing the general proposition that ordinarily it is not for the federal courts to say whether or in what amounts a state shall provide any particular government benefit or service. E. g., Fullington v. Shea, D.Colo.1970, 320 F.Supp. 500, aff’d, 404 U.S. 963, 92 S.Ct. 345, 30 L.Ed.2d 282. We find these arguments unpersuasive. It goes without saying that state legislatures are ordinarily free to choose among various social services competing [*1315] for legislative attention and state funds. But that do…
• Bradley v. Milliken, 540 F.2d 229 (6th Cir. 1976)
  …blishing the general proposition that ordinarily it is not for the federal courts to say whether or in what amounts a state shall provide any particular governmental benefit or service. E. g., Fullington v. Shea, D.Colo.1970, 320 F.Supp. 500, aff’d, 404 U.S. 963, 92 S.Ct. 345, 30 L.Ed.2d 282. We find these arguments unpersuasive. It goes without saying that state legislatures are ordinarily free to choose among various social services competing for legislative attention and state funds. But that does not m…