EMHART CORP.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• Egal v. State, 469 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …e decided under section 800.03 which prohibits indecent exposure. However, the element of lewdness and lasciviousness has been determined to exist under both section 800.03 and 800.04. See Hoffman v. Carson, 250 So. 2d 891 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 404 U.S. 981, 92 S.Ct. 453, 30 L.Ed.2d 365 (1971); Goodmakers v. State, supra. On the other hand, Cheseb-rough found that exposing a young child to a view of sexual intercourse between his mother and stepfather was lewd and lascivious, as was conduct in Buchanan…
• Goodmakers v. State, 450 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …ssue, Goodmakers argues that the circuit court rendered a decision in “direct conflict” with the respective holdings of the Supreme Court of Florida and the First District Court of Appeal in Hoffman v. Carson, 250 So. 2d 891 (Fla.), appeal dismissed 404 U.S. 981, 92 S.Ct. 453, 30 L.Ed.2d 365 (1971), and Duvallon v. State, 404 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). He maintains that he has therefore been found guilty of conduct which is not proscribed by Florida law. In Hoffman, the Florida Supreme Court made the…
• Marrs v. State, 413 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …e bared her breasts while taking a shower in a public shower stall at a spa or a gym or, conceivably, while undergoing an examination at a doctor’s office. [*776] Compare Hoffman v. Carson, 250 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1971), appeal dismissed, 92 S.Ct. 453, 404 U.S. 981, 30 L.Ed.2d 365 (1971) (Proviso in Section 800.03, Florida Statutes, that: “This act shall not be construed to prohibit the exposure of such organs or the person in any place provided or set apart for that purpose,” sufficiently restricts the applic…