WIENER ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1973)
  …v. Dykema, 398 U. S. 278 (1970); Walker v. Ohio, 398 U. S. 434 (1970); Hoyt v. Minnesota, supra; Childs v. Oregon, 401 U. S. 1006 (1971); Bloss v. Michigan, 402 U. S. 938 (1971); Burgin v. South Carolina, 404 U. S. 809 (1971); Hartstein v. Missouri, 404 U. S. 988 (1971); Wiener v. California, 404 U. S. 988 (1971). Although I did not join the opinion of the Court in Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U. S. 557 (1969), I ana now inclined to agree that “the Constitution protects the right to receive information and ideas…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Palladino, 475 F.2d 65 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …e, any more than the testimony of experts relating to the state of the art in patent suits determines the patentability of a controverted device.” 361 U.S. at 165, 80 S.Ct. at 225. . Defendants assert that the Supreme Court in Wiener v. California, 404 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct. 534, 30 L.Ed.2d 539 (1971), found the magazine “My-O-My” not obscene as a matter of law. Since neither the Supreme Court’s order nor the summary of the ruling below, 40 U.S.L.W. 3240 (U.S. Nov. 16, 1971), indicate anything in that regard,…
• Myron M. Amato v. Divine, 496 F.2d 441 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …v. Dyke-ma, 398 U.S. 278, 90 S.Ct. 1727, 26 L.Ed.2d 230 (1970); (2) Togetherness (1969 Tudor House, Inc.) and Flesh Fantasy—Burgin v. South Carolina, 404 U.S. 806, 92 S.Ct. 46, 30 L.Ed.2d 39 (1971); and (3) The Ballers, No. 1 —Wiener v. California, 404 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct. 534, 30 L.Ed.2d 539 (1971).…