ARGERSINGER

v.

HAMLIN, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By

• Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (U.S. 1972)
  …t Court, which denied relief. Their appeals were consolidated in the Court of Appeals which, sitting en banc, in each case affirmed the District Court by a four-to-three vote, 443 F. 2d 942. The cases are here on a petition for a writ of certiorari, 404 U. S. 999, which we granted because there is a conflict between the decision below and Hahn v. Burke, 430 F. 2d 100, decided by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Iowa has a board of parole1 which determines who shall be paroled. Once paroled, a p…
• California v. LaRUE, 409 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1972)
  …under the Roth line of cases, and that the governmental interest being furthered by the regulations did not meet the tests laid down in O’Brien, the court enjoined the enforcement of the regulations. 326 F. Supp. 348. We noted probable jurisdiction. 404 U. S. 999. The state regulations here challenged come to us, not in the context of censoring a dramatic performance in a theater, but rather in a context of licensing bars and nightclubs to sell liquor by the drink. In Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter, 384 U. S.…
• McNEIL v. Dir., Patuxent Inst., 407 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1972)
  …Patuxent until the procedures for. such determination have been completed regardless of whether or not the criminal sentence [*249] has expired.” App. 35-36. The Court of Appeals of Maryland denied leave to appeal. App. 37-38. We granted certiorari, 404 U. S. 999 (1971). II The State of Maryland asserts the power to confine petitioner indefinitely, without ever obtaining a judicial determination that such confine'ment is warranted. Respondent advances several distinct arguments in support of that claim. A…

  ← 1 / 2 →