WILKINS, ADMINISTRATRIX

v.

AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN LINES, INC.; AND AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN LINES, INC. V. WILKINS, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Dawson Chem. Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1980)
  …nt misuse and the scope of 35 U. S. C, § 271 (d). Cf., e. g., Ansul Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc., 306 F. Supp. 541, 562 (SDNY 1969), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 448 F. 2d 872 (CA2 1971), cert. denied sub nom. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Louisville Chemical Co., 404 U. S. 1018 (1972); Rohm & Haas Co. v. Roberts Chemicals, Inc., 245 F. 2d 693, 699 (CA4 1957); Harte & Co. v. L. E. Carpenter & Co., 138 USPQ 578, 584 (SDNY 1963); Sola Electric Co. V. General Electric Co., 146 F. Supp. 625, 647-648 (ND Ill. 1956). See also Nel…
• Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp. & Am. Commercial Lines, Inc., 521 F.2d 31 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …employment, and said vessel’s owner, owner pro hac vice, agent, operator, charter or bare boat charterer, master, officer, or crew member.” . See, e. g., Blair v. United States Steel Corp., 444 F. 2d 1390 (3d Cir. 1971) (per curiam), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1018, 92 S.Ct. 481, 30 L.Ed.2d 666 (1972); Aird v. Weyerhaeuser S. S. Co., 169 F. 2d 606, 609-10 (3d Cir. 1948). See generally G. Gilmore & C. Black, The Law of Admiralty §§ 4-20 to 4—24, at 239-43 (2d ed. 1975). . Although § 905(b) created a new neglig…
• Bankers Tr. Co. v. Rhoades, 859 F.2d 1096 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …rom defendants’ conduct are “unrecoverable if the fact of their accrual is speculative or their amount and nature unprovable.” Id.; see also Berkey Photo, 603 F. 2d at 295; Ansul Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc., 448 F. 2d 872, 884 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1018, 92 S.Ct. 680, 30 L.Ed.2d 666 (1972). In such cases, “refusal to award future damages as too speculative is equivalent to holding that no cause of action has yet accrued for any but those damages already suffered. The cause of action for future dama…