ALOMAR

v.

DWYER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (U.S. 1975)
  …ry procedure, if followed, was constitutionally adequate. See, e. g., United States v. Knohl, 379 F. 2d 427, 434-435 (CA2), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 973 (1967); United States ex rel. Evans v. LaVallee, 446 F. 2d 782, 785-786 (CA2 1971), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 1020 (1972). Nor did the Court prescribe a general standard with respect to the nature or quantum of evidence necessary to require resort to an adequate procedure.9 Rather, it noted that [*173] under the Illinois statute a hearing was required where the…
• Ill. State Emps. Union v. Lewis, 473 F.2d 561 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …oth Alomar and Shapp were decided within a year prior to Sindermann. Indeed the Supreme Court without a dissenting voice denied certio-rari in Alomar on January 10, 1972, only six months prior to that Court’s decision in Sindermann. Alomar v. Dwyer, 404 U.S. 1020, 92 S.Ct. 683, 30 L.Ed.2d 667. Too, discussion or even citation of Alo-mar or Shapp was conspicuously omitted from the Sindermann opinion (or in the concurring and dissenting opinions). Thus, as matters now stand, the declared law of the Second Cir…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497 (1st Cir. 1984)
  …tions infringe on the free exercise of religion. United States v. Middleton, 690 F. 2d 820, 825 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051, 103 S.Ct. 1497, 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983); United States v. Spears, 443 F. 2d 895 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1020, 92 S.Ct. 693, 30 L.Ed.2d 669 (1972); Leary v. United States, 383 F. 2d 851, 859-61 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969); Randall, 441 F.Supp. at 316 & n. 2; Kuch, 288 F.Supp. at 448. Only last year…