RODRIQUEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Lipscomb v. Clark, 468 F.2d 1321 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …n accord with the position of the Solicitor General of the United States before the Supreme Court in one of the earlier rounds of this petitioner’s long battle with the United States. The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Lipscomb v. United States, 404 U.S. 1021, 30 L.Ed.2d 670 (1972), the day before Tucker was announced. In a supplementary memorandum, the Solicitor General joined with Lipscomb’s petition for rehearing, urging that the case should be remanded to the district court in light of Tucker. Althou…
• United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 1048 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …of Brown and others similarly situated cannot prevail against a voluntary consent to search granted by a lessee, such as McKinney, who has possession and control of the premises. Leeper v. United States, 446 F. 2d 281 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1021, 92 S.Ct. 695, 30 L.Ed.2d 671 (1972). See also Burge v. United States, 342 F. 2d 408 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 829, 86 S.Ct. 63, 15 L.Ed.2d 72 (1966). In so holding, we did no more— and perhaps less — than the courts who rendered de…
• United States v. Crocker, 510 F.2d 1129 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …of the secretive nature of the crime and the reliance upon circumstantial evidence, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. United States v. Butler, supra; Leeper v. United States, 446 F. 2d 281 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1021, 92 S.Ct. 695, 30 L.Ed.2d 671 (1972). A detailed review of the evidence supporting the jury conviction is not necessary. We deem these brief recitals to be relevant: (1) Crocker knew of the fact that the $10.00 bills possessed by Blankenship and La…