ANGLE, DBA KANSAS REFINED HELIUM CO.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (45 total)

• United States v. Kenny, 462 F.2d 1205 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …commerce to be used in furtherance of the extortion, and hence to prove Count II. Thus this is not a case where there was no evidence of the existence of a conspiracy. Compare United States v. DeCavalcante, 440 F. 2d 1264 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. den. 404 U.S. 1039, 92 S.Ct. 715, 30 L.Ed. 731. The appellants claim, however, that although there was ample proof of concert of action, and ample proof of substantive violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and ample proof of use of the facilities of interstate commerce, an…
• United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …6 U.S. 626, 45 S.Ct. 125, 69 L.Ed. 475 (1924). The jury was properly instructed that Spiegel had to withdraw before any act committed within the statute of limitations period. United States v. Nowak, 448 F. 2d 134, 140 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1039, 92 S.Ct. 714, 30 L.Ed.2d 731 (1972). Good faith may also be required to withdraw. The defendant must put forth some evidence of good faith, although the burden of persuasion is always on the government. United States v. Dorn, 561 F. 2d at 1256; Un…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Keane, 522 F.2d 534 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …here, argues that this represents a weakness in the government case, the defendant invites a response as to why the government chose the trial strategy that it did. See e. g., United States v. Nowak, 448 F. 2d 134, 141 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1039, 92 S.Ct. 714, 30 L.Ed.2d 731 (1972); United States v. Lawler, 413 F. 2d 622, 628 (7th Cir. 1969); cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 698, 24 L.Ed.2d 691 (1970). There was no reversible error committed by the prosecutors during their closing and…