DOHERTY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (U.S. 1972)
  …ate concurrence of Mr. Justice Stewart. Preceded by a long line of cases recognizing the constitutional right to travel, and repeatedly reaffirmed in the face of attempts to disregard it, see Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U. S. 49 (1970), and Wyman v. Lopez, 404 U. S. 1055 (1972), Shapiro and the compelling-state-interest test it articulates control this case. Tennessee attempts to distinguish Shapiro by urging that “the vice of the welfare statute in Shapiro . . . was its objective to deter interstate travel.” Brief…
• Mem'l Hosp. v. Maricopa Cnty., 415 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1974)
  …& Surety Co., 406 U. S. 164, 173 (1972); Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U. S. 330, 335 (1972). 394 U. S., at 634. See also id., at 642-644 (Stewart, J., concurring). Dunn v. Blumstein, supra; Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618 (1969); see Wyman v. Lopez, 404 U. S. 1055 (1972); Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U. S. 112, 237 (1970) (separate opinion of Brennan, White, and Marshall, JJ.), 285-286 (Stewart, J., concurring and dissenting, with whom Burger, C. J., and Blackmun, J., joined); [*255] Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U. S. 49…
• Deerfield Med. Ctr. v. City OF Deerfield Beach, 661 F.2d 328 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …of Park Ridge, 567 F. 2d 689 (7th Cir. 1975). Similarly the right of privacy must be carefully guarded for once an infringement has occurred it cannot be undone by monetary relief. Kennan v. Nichol, 326 F.Supp. 613, 616 (W.D.Wis.1971), aff’d mem., 404 U.S. 1055, 92 S.Ct. 735, 30 L.Ed.2d 743 (1972) (“to withhold a temporary restraining order is to permit the [constitutional right of privacy] to be lost irreparably with respect to the physician and those women for whom he would otherwise perform the'operatio…