J. L. RUSSELL, AS MARSHAL OF THE TOWN OF ATLANTIC BEACH,
v.
JOHN E. MATHEWS

Fla. | 1937-02-17
Wi-iitfteld and. Brown, J. J., concur.', Ellis, C. J., and Davis, J., dissent., Buford, J., not participating because of illness.
127 Fla. 169 Florida Supreme Court (1937) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 172 So. 691
Cited by 8 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves a habeas corpus petition filed by an individual arrested for violating a town ordinance. The Florida Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision to discharge the petitioner, finding that the legal issues were identical to a related equity suit decided concurrently.


Holding

The court held that the decision in the related equity suit, which involved identical legal questions, was conclusive for this habeas corpus case. Therefore, the petitioner should not have been discharged.


Key Quotes

“The identical legal questions being involved in both causes, it follows that our decision in the latter case is conclusive as to the issues in this case.”

This quote establishes the court's reasoning for applying the decision from the related equity suit to the habeas corpus case.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The petitioner was arrested by the Town Marshal for violating a town ordinance after entering a protected zone with knowledge of the ordinance. He fil…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Terrell, J.

Terrell, J.

The facts in this case are the same as those in the equity suit entitled Town of Atlantic Beach, et al., v. Otto J. Oosterhoudt, et al., decided this date. After the hearing for preliminary injunction in the equity suit, the petitioner here having invaded the protected zone with knowledge of the ordinance, was arrested and taken in custody by the Town. He filed his petition for habeas corpus in substantially the same terms as his petition for intervention in the equity suit.

The habeas corpus proceeding was argued at the same time final hearing was conducted in the equity suit and an order discharging petitioner followed the final decree 'in that suit. The identical legal questions being involved in both causes, it follows that our decision in the latter case is conclusive as to the issues in this case.

*170The judgment discharging the petitioner in this case is accordingly reversed and he is ordered remanded to the custody of the respondent.

It is so ordered.

Wi-iitfteld and. Brown, J. J., concur.'

Ellis, C. J., and Davis, J., dissent.

Buford, J., not participating because of illness.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tharp v. Kitchell, 151 Fla. 226 (Fla. 1942)
    …73 So. 151, Ann. Cas. 1918D 121; Forbes v. Ft. Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821; Reese v. Schench, 107 Fla. 166, 144 So. 313; Sections 6789 and 6822 C.G.L.; Anderson v. Ax, 104 Fla. 294, 139 So. 798; Fannin v. Fritter, 127 Fla. 97, 172 So. 691; Erwin v. Crandall, 219 Fla. 43, 175 So. 862; Weirs v. White, 142 Fla. 628, 196 So. 206; Knabb v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 144 Fla. 110, 197 So. 707, and text writers and cases from other jurisdictions. The case of McCranie v. Cason, 79 Fla. 8…
  • Marinelli v. Weaver, 187 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  • …ay be compelled to pay it.” Parol evidence is not admissible to show that one whose status is fixed by statute as that of an endorser occupies some • contrary status. See Baumeister v. Kuntz, 53 Fla. 340, 42 So. 886; Fannin v. Fritter, 127 Fla. 97, 172 So. 691. • That the owner and holder of a note may rely upon acceleration clause contained in the mortgage given to secure the payment of the note to accelerate the maturity of the note is well settled. Spadaro v. Baird, 97 Fla. 50, 119 So. 788. This is tr…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw