CROSBY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …bout to say, although he may claim the privilege if his new testimony might suggest that he had perjured himself in testifying on the same subject at a prior proceeding. United States v. Wilcox, 450 F. 2d 1131, 1140-41 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 917, 92 S.Ct. 944, 30 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972). We also note our recent statements in United States v. Melchor Moreno, 536 F. 2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1976): A court must make a particularized inquiry, deciding, in connection with each specific area that the questi…
• United States v. Metz, 608 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …rly appointed counsel and questioned Bland, scrutinizing his rationale for refusing to testify. Rogers v. United States, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, 95 L.Ed. 344 (1951); United States v. Wilcox, 450 F. 2d 1131, 1136-37 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 917, 92 S.Ct. 944, 30 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972). That inquiry satisfied the trial court that by testifying Bland might subject himself to state prosecution. The substantial possibility of prosecution sufficed to excuse Bland. Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.…
• Schnadig Corp. v. Gaines Mfg. Co., Inc., 494 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …dly that the presumption of validity is weakened when the Patent Office has not considered pertinent and material prior art. See, e. g., Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 445 F; 2d 911, 914, 916 (6th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 917, 92 S.Ct. 941, 30 L.Ed.2d 786 (1972); Monroe Auto Equipment Co., supra, 332 F. 2d at 412-413; Preformed Line Products Co. v. Fanner Mfg., 328 F. 2d 265 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 846, 85 S.Ct. 56, 13 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1964). By pertinent and mate…