MCKILLOP

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. McMILLAN, 508 F.2d 101 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …ect examination that she had concealed and used some of the heroin, and McMillan’s attorney cross-examined both Johnson and the agent on this point. There was no prejudice. See United States v. Cole, 449 F. 2d 194, 198 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 931, 92 S.Ct. 991, 30 L.Ed.2d 806 (1972). McMillan contends that the District Court erred in refusing to strike the testimony of the government’s chemist, Terry R. Gaston, on the ground that the man was not an expert at all. We have held on numerous oc…
• United States v. Carlee Brown, 482 F.2d 1226 (8th Cir. 1973)
  …scretion in controlling the scope of cross-examination. Only when there is a clear abuse of that discretion and an adequate showing of prejudice will its rulings be overturned. United States v. Cole, 449 F. 2d 194, 199 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 931, 92 S.Ct. 987, 30 L.Ed.2d 806 (1972). In the instant case, it is doubtful whether the line of questioning sought to be undertaken would have impeached the credibility of the witness. Yet, even conceding the relevance of the proposed inquiries to th…
• United States v. Barnes, 486 F.2d 776 (8th Cir. 1973)
  …ed by the trial judge on February 8, 1973. Trial commenced on February 12, 1973. The general rule concerning discovery of witnesses applicable in this circuit was set forth in United States v. Cole, 449 F. 2d 194, 198 (8th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 931, 92 S.Ct. 987, 30 L. Ed.2d 806 (1972), wherein we said: “In a noncapital ease an accused has no constitutional right to require the production of the names and addresses of possible witnesses. Drews v. Minnesota, 407 F. 2d 1307 (8 Cir. 1969); Barne…