LOVISI

v.

VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By (83 total)

• United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …s Act. Brown would typify the evidence as establishing at most only the solicitation of a bribe without any evidence of fear or duress on the part of Reliance or its officers. See United States v. Addonizio, 451 F. 2d 49, 72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936, 92 S.Ct. 949, 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); United States v. Kubacki, 237 F.Supp. 638, 641-42 (E.D.Pa.1965). 18 U.S.C. § 1951(b)(2) defines extortion as “the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threa…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …originating in other states. See, e.g., United States v. Cerilii, [*593] 603 F. 2d 415, 424 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1043, 100 S.Ct. 728, 62 L.Ed.2d 728 (1980); United States v. Addonizio, 451 F. 2d 49, 77 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936, 92 S.Ct. 949, 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972). In United States v. Rindone, 631 F. 2d 491 (7th Cir. 1980), the Hobbs Act conviction of a municipal inspector who had extorted money in exchange for work permits was challenged on the ground that there was no ne…
• United States v. Adams, 759 F.2d 1099 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …stacchio urges that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a bill of particulars. Again, on this issue, our standard of review is abuse of discretion. United States v. Addonizio, 451 F. 2d 49, 64 (3d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936, 92 S.Ct. 949, 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972). “The denial of a motion for a bill of particulars does not amount to an abuse of discretion unless the deprivation of the information sought leads to the defendant’s inability to adequately prepare his case, to…