HAYNES ET AL.

v.

LINDER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (U.S. 1978)
  …to our Constitution by becoming citizens. Cf. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Comm’n, 424 U. S. 645 (1976); Detroit Police Officers Assn. v. Detroit, 385 Mich. 519, 190 N. W. 2d 97 (1971), dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 405 U. S. 950 (1972).…
• McCARTHY v. Philadelphia Civil Serv. Comm'n, 424 U.S. 645 (U.S. 1976)
  …d did not violate the Due Process Clause or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.4 We dismissed the appeal from that judgment because no substantial federal question was presented. Detroit Police Officers Assn. v. City of Detroit, 405 U. S. 950 (1972). We have therefore held that this kind of ordinance is not irrational. Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U. S. 332, 343-345 (1975); see War dwell v. Board of Education of Cincinnati, 529 F. 2d 625, 628 (CA6 1976). We have not, however, specifically addr…
• Wright v. The City OF Jackson, 506 F.2d 900 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …al protection test that the classification bore a reasonable relationship to the object of the legislation. An appeal was taken to the United States Supreme Court which ordered that the case be “dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.” 405 U.S. 950, 92 S.Ct. 1173, 31 L.Ed.2d 227 (1972). The Seventh Circuit recently considered thé effect of this disposition in a case involving a challenge to a Chicago ordinance requiring policemen to reside within the city. Ahern v. Murphy, 457 F. 2d 363 (7th…