CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC., ET AL.

v.

SIEGEL ET AL.; AND SIEGEL ET AL. V. CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (85 total)

• Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. D.S.C. OF Newark Enters., Inc., 544 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …a.1976). Also excluded are conditions that are expressly assumed by the insured, such as an existing mortgage. See Bradford v. Thompson, 460 S.W. 2d 932 (Tex.Civ.App.1970), reversed in part on other grounds, 470 S.W. 2d 633 (Tex.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955, 92 S.Ct. 1174, 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). The title insurer will not be held to have extended coverage to a condition which results from the fraud of the insured. See Applefield v. Commercial Standard Insurance Company, 176 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA), c…
• Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. NO. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (U.S. 1984)
  …tie-ins subjects restrictions on a franchisee’s freedom to purchase supplies to a more searching scrutiny than restrictions on his freedom to sell his products. Compare, e. g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F. 2d 43 (CA9 1971), cert. denied, 405 U. S. 955 (1972), with Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U. S. 36 (1977). And exclusive contracts that, like tie-ins, require the buyer to purchase a product from one seller are subject only to the rule of reason. See infra, at 44-45. See n.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Mayo Perez, 489 F.2d 51 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …enied, 1945, 326 U.S. 757, 66 S.Ct. 99, 90 L.Ed. 455; United States v. Fischetti, 5 Cir., 1971, 450 F. 2d 34, cert. denied, 1972, 405 U.S. 1016, 92 S.Ct. 1290, 31 L.Ed.2d 478; United States v. Jacobs, 5 Cir., 1971, 451 F. 2d 530, cert. denied, 1972, 405 U.S. 955, 92 S.Ct. 1170, 31 L.Ed.2d 231; Roberts v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F. 2d 1216; Castro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 296 F. 2d 540; United States v. Warner, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F. 2d 821, cert. denied, 1971, 404 U.S. 829, 92 S.Ct. 65, 30 L.E…