SASKO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Irie E. Leonard, 494 F.2d 955 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …L.Ed.2d 544 (1966). On this record, the jury could “reasonably be expected to compartmentalize the evidence as it relates to separate defendants.” United States v. DeLarosa, 450 F. 2d 1057 (3 Cir.1971), cert, denied sub nom., Jones v. United States, 405 U.S. 957, 92 S.Ct. 1188, 31 L.Ed.2d 235 (1972). And the district court specifically instructed the jury to determine the guilt or innocence of each defendant by considering only his own conduct and the evidence which applied to him. Finally, the verdicts dem…
• United States v. Rodriguez, 509 F.2d 1342 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …to introduce evidence of subsequent consistent statements. See, United States v. Jimenez, 496 F. 2d 288, 292 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Gandy, 469 F. 2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Bays, 448 F. 2d 977 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 957, 92 S.Ct. 1186, 31 L.Ed.2d 234 (1972). . A hearsay statement is an extrajudicial declaration offered to prove the truth of the matter stated. See, McCormick, Evidence, § 246 (1972). . Even if the testimony was used to prove the facts asserted in o…
• United States v. Hill, 496 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …not reasonably have led the jury to a predisposition of guilt by improperly confusing the functions of judge and prosecutor. See United States v. Arroyave, 5 Cir. 1973, 477 F. 2d 157; United States v. Bays, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F. 2d 977, cert. denied, 405 U.S. 957, 92 S.Ct. 1186, 31 L.Ed.2d 234. We have also noted that, “[ajbove all, the trial judge must maintain an attitude of impartiality and avoid giving the impression that he believes the accused is guilty. Otherwise, there is risk of a judge’s usurping…