UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA

v.

BRYANT, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. Roos, 326 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …Elections for Howard County, 266 Md. 440, 295 A. 2d 223 (1972) ; and “The Right of a Married Woman to Use Her Birth-Given Surname for Voter Registration”, 32 Maryland Law Rev. 409 (1973). . Forbush v. Wallace, 341 F.Supp. 217 (M.D.Ala.1971), aff'd 405 U.S. 970, 92 S.Ct. 1197, 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).…
• Dillon v. Coles, 746 F.2d 998 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …n 1968). Thus the public assistance benefits are treated as a loan the recipient must repay. See Shearer v. Moore, 277 Pa.Super. 70, 419 A. 2d 665 (1980). See also Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F.Supp. 1175 (E.D.Pa.1971) (3 Judge court), aff'd mem., 405 U.S. 970, 92 S.Ct. 1204, 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972). Just as in the unemployment benefits repayment situation we see no reason to require the state to file a separate suit to recoup the public assistance payments. Craig does not control where the back pay award…
• Carey v. Greyhound BUS Co., Inc., 500 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …action is that all members (they still assume the number to be 28) of the class are in or around New Orleans, and hence it is not impracticable to join them as parties to this suit. In Forbush v. Wallace, 341 F.Supp. 217 (M.D.Ala., 1971), affirmed, 405 U.S. 970, 92 S.Ct. 1197, 31 L.Ed.2d 246, the Court said: “It has become well established in our law that ‘impracticability’ as used in Rule 23 does not mean ‘impossibility,’ but rather it refers to the difficulty or inconvenience of joining all members of t…