HALEY

v.

UNITED STATES; AND LILEY ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (88 total)

• Zygadlo v. Wainwright, 49 Fla. Supp. 153 (Bradford Cty. Cir. Ct. 1979)
  …y protected in a free society under the First Amendment be proscribed, limited, or prohibited in a prison setting. The question is answered in the affirmative under the specific language of Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F2d 178 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. den. 405 U.S. 978, and the exhaustive treatment of prison necessity and discipline in Wolff v. McDonnell 94 S.Ct. 2963 (1974). Therefore, there is no question that the materials complained of and referred to in the charges (a copy of which is attached to respondent’s…
• Wolff v. McDONNELL, 418 U.S. 539 (U.S. 1974)
  …7 1973), while two have held that oral notice is sufficient, Meyers v. Alldredge, 492 F. 2d 296 (CA3 1974); Braxton v. Carlson, 483 F. 2d 933 (CA3 1973); Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F. 2d 178 (CA2 1971) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Oswald v. Sostre, 405 U. S. 978 (1972). The Ninth Circuit, Clutchette v. Procunier, supra, has held that a written statement of reasons and a written record of the proceedings must be provided, while the Second and Third Circuits have held to the contrary, Braxton v. Carlson, supr…
• Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (U.S. 1974)
  …, has required only that censorship of personal correspondence not lack support “in any rational and constitutionally- acceptable concept of a prison system.” Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F. 2d 178, 199 (CA2 1971), cert. denied sub nom. Oswald v. Sostre, 405 U. S. 978 (1972). At the other extreme some courts have- been willing tp require demonstration of a “compelling state interest” to justify censorship of' prisoner mail. E. g., Jackson v. Godwin, 400 F. 2d 529 [*407] (CA5 1968) (decided on both equal protectio…