IN RE O'CONNOR
IN RE O'CONNOR
405 U.S. 981
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Egger v. Harlan C. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292 (7th Cir. 1983)…ized and searching review of the record, see, e.g., Monsanto v. Quinn, 674 F. 2d 990, 996 n. 10 (3d Cir.1982), Tygrett v. Barry, 627 F. 2d 1279, 1282-83 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also, Grausam v. Murphey, 448 F. 2d 197, 201 (3d Cir.1971), cert. dismissed, 405 U.S. 981, 92 S.Ct. 1207, 31 L.Ed.2d 257 (1972). IY In January 1971 the FBI offered Egger a position as a Special Agent. Egger accepted the offer of employment, executing an agreement which specifically provided: I may be sent to any part of the continenta…
-
Liston Monsanto v. Quinn, 674 F.2d 990 (3d Cir. 1982)…view is to assure that those factors have been applied with the deference to be accorded First Amendment rights." Tygrett v. Barry, 627 F. 2d 1279, 1282-83 (D.C.Cir.1980). See Grausam v. Murphey, 448 F. 2d 197, 201 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. dismissed, 405 U.S. 981, 92 S.Ct. 1207, 31 L.Ed.2d 257 (1972) (where violation of First Amendment rights has been alleged “a comprehensive review of the entire record is important to assure that no intrusion upon them has occurred” but, under Rule 52(a), findings of fact b…
-
NEW York City Unemployed & Welf. Council v. Stanley Brezenoff/Commissioner of the N.Y. City Human Res. Admin. & Comm'r of N.Y. City Dep't of Soc. Servs., 742 F.2d 718 (2d Cir. 1984)…pecific facts on remand, and its finding that the only reasonable way to serve the HRA’s interest in preventing fraud was to ban solicitation altogether is a finding of fact. See Grausam v. Murphey, 448 F. 2d 197, 201 (3d Cir.1971), cert. dismissed, 405 U.S. 981, 92 S.Ct. 1207, 31 L.Ed.2d 257 (1972). We cannot set aside this finding of fact unless it is clearly erroneous, Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), i.e., unless we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v.…