SIMICH ET AL.

v.

MILISAVLJEVIC ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …States v. Drougas, 748 F. 2d 8, 26 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Espinoza, 641 F. 2d 153, 170 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841, 102 S.Ct. 153, 70 L.Ed.2d 125 (1981); United States v. Alper, 449 F. 2d 1223, 1229 (3d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct. 1605, 31 L.Ed.2d 822 (1972). See also Puerta Restrepo, 814 F. 2d at 1239. In this instance, the prosecution presented copious evidence of similarities between these calls and Ingraham’s letters. The government made a like showing in compa…
• United States v. Iannelli, 477 F.2d 999 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …stantial evidence supports the identification. See United States v. Addonizio, 451 F. 2d 49, 71-72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936, 92 S.Ct. 949, 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); United States v. Alper, 449 F. 2d 1223, 1229 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct. 1248, 31 L. Ed.2d 453 (1972). The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Triumph Curing Ctr. & M. F. Lee, 571 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …ls from the Union in exchange for work at Lee, (or Triumph in Wan’s case). Employer activities which are calculated to erode employee support for the union violate section 8(a)(1). NLRB v. Deutsch Co., 445 F. 2d 902, 906 (9 Cir. 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct. 1248, 31 L.Ed.2d 454 (1972).5 It is unlawful under section 8(a)(1) “for an employer to instigate and promote a decertification proceeding or induce employees to sign any form of union-repudiating document, particularly where the solicitati…